Infections and the Kidney

Global infections are very frequent cause of AKI. Often this is due to the non-specific systemic effects of sepsis and volume depletion and therefore can occur with many infectious agents perhaps most searingly brought to our attention with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The kidney can also be damaged by infections directly involving the renal parenchyma, because of persistent infection elsewhere in the body, as a post-infectious response and secondary diseases causing obstruction. Identifying, first, that kidney injury is due to infection and the particular infection causing the patient's presentation is critical to management. Some infections discussed in this chapter are confined to specific areas of the world, but with increasing global travel and migration, patients may present to healthcare facilities anywhere;thus, a thorough travel history is invaluable. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2014, 2022.

Management of Post-Infectious Anosmia and Hyposmia: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Anosmia and hyposmia significantly affect patients' quality of life and have many etiologies, including trauma, inflammatory conditions including chronic rhinosinusitis, neoplasm, and viral infections, such as rhinovirus and SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to establish whether a consensus exists regarding optimal management of olfactory dysfunction and to provide insight into the treatment of anosmia in the current climate of increased prevalence secondary to COVID-19. Thus, we aimed to systematically review the literature on the management of non-Chronic-rhinosinusitis- related anosmia/hyposmia. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published since January 1990 using terms combined with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We included articles evaluating management of anosmia and hyposmia written in the English language, with original data, a minimum of 3 months of follow-up except for COVID-related studies, at least 2 patients, and well-defined and measurable outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3013 unique titles were returned upon the initial search. Of these, 297 abstracts were examined, yielding 19 full texts meeting inclusion criteria (8 with level 1 evidence, 3 with level 2, 1 with level 3, and 7 with level 4). The studies included a total of 1522 subjects, with follow up ranging from 3 to 72 months, with an exception for COVID related studies. Endpoints were based on clinically significant improvements of olfactory functions as measured through validated smell tests. Treatments with the most robust data were intranasal corticosteroids and olfactory training. CONCLUSION: The literature on the treatment of anosmia and hyposmia includes randomized trials showing the efficacy of a few modalities. While further research is needed to expand therapeutic options for this debilitating condition, the current literature supports the use of olfactory training and topical corticosteroids.

Assessment of specific T-cell immunity in patients who have been ill and vaccinated against COVID-19.

Introduction. In the context of a pandemic of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19), research on the peculiarities of the formation of an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients who have been ill and vaccinated is of particular relevance. However, most studies are currently devoted to evaluating only the humoral link of immunity, and its cellular component remains insufficiently studied. The aim of the study was to evaluate the features of the formation and changes of the T-cell link of immunity in patients with a new coronavirus infection and vaccinated against this disease. Materials and methods. The study was performed on the basis of the clinical and diagnostic laboratory of the European Medical Center "UMMC-Health "LLC. Specific T-cell immunity was evaluated using ELISPOT technology. In the course of the study, 72 blood samples of employees of medical organizations were analyzed, including 26 from those who had a new coronavirus infection, 23 from persons who were intact according to COVID-19 before vaccination and 23 from the same employees after vaccination (<<Gam-Covid-Vac>>). In addition, each of the study participants was examined to determine specific class G antibodies (IgG) by solid-phase enzyme immunoassay using SARS-CoV-2-IgG-ELISA-BEST test systems (manufactured by VECTOR-BEST JSC). Results and discussion. In the group of patients (26 people), T-lymphocytes capable of specifically reacting to SARSCoV-2 antigens were detected in 100% of cases, even in individuals with IgG elimination. It should be noted that the response was more pronounced when meeting with M-and N-pepdids, compared with S-protein. 22 out of 23 COVID-19 intact individuals had no T-cell immunity to coronavirus infection before vaccination, but one employee had a response to 3 proteins-M, N, S, which indicates that he had previously encountered the SARS-CoV-2 virus. After vaccination with the drug "Gam-Covid-Vac", 22 (95.6%) employees revealed a T-cell response, while 21-only to S-protein, and an employee with a previously detected immune response-after vaccination, the response to M -, N-proteins remained almost at the same level, and the cellular response to S-peptide doubled. Conclusion. Thus, based on the results of the study, important materials were obtained on the peculiarities of the formation of a specific T-cell immune response to a new coronavirus infection. The obtained data provide a broader understanding of the immune response in new coronavirus infection in patients who have been ill and vaccinated and can be used in the future when planning preventive and anti-epidemic measures.Copyright © 2022 Interregional public organization Association of infectious disease specialists of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region (IPO AIDSSPbR). All rights reserved.

Assessment of specific T-cell immunity in patients who have been ill and vaccinated against COVID-19.

Introduction. In the context of a pandemic of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19), research on the peculiarities of the formation of an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients who have been ill and vaccinated is of particular relevance. However, most studies are currently devoted to evaluating only the humoral link of immunity, and its cellular component remains insufficiently studied. The aim of the study was to evaluate the features of the formation and changes of the T-cell link of immunity in patients with a new coronavirus infection and vaccinated against this disease. Materials and methods. The study was performed on the basis of the clinical and diagnostic laboratory of the European Medical Center "UMMC-Health "LLC. Specific T-cell immunity was evaluated using ELISPOT technology. In the course of the study, 72 blood samples of employees of medical organizations were analyzed, including 26 from those who had a new coronavirus infection, 23 from persons who were intact according to COVID-19 before vaccination and 23 from the same employees after vaccination (<<Gam-Covid-Vac>>). In addition, each of the study participants was examined to determine specific class G antibodies (IgG) by solid-phase enzyme immunoassay using SARS-CoV-2-IgG-ELISA-BEST test systems (manufactured by VECTOR-BEST JSC). Results and discussion. In the group of patients (26 people), T-lymphocytes capable of specifically reacting to SARSCoV-2 antigens were detected in 100% of cases, even in individuals with IgG elimination. It should be noted that the response was more pronounced when meeting with M-and N-pepdids, compared with S-protein. 22 out of 23 COVID-19 intact individuals had no T-cell immunity to coronavirus infection before vaccination, but one employee had a response to 3 proteins-M, N, S, which indicates that he had previously encountered the SARS-CoV-2 virus. After vaccination with the drug "Gam-Covid-Vac", 22 (95.6%) employees revealed a T-cell response, while 21-only to S-protein, and an employee with a previously detected immune response-after vaccination, the response to M -, N-proteins remained almost at the same level, and the cellular response to S-peptide doubled. Conclusion. Thus, based on the results of the study, important materials were obtained on the peculiarities of the formation of a specific T-cell immune response to a new coronavirus infection. The obtained data provide a broader understanding of the immune response in new coronavirus infection in patients who have been ill and vaccinated and can be used in the future when planning preventive and anti-epidemic measures.Copyright © 2022 Interregional public organization Association of infectious disease specialists of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region (IPO AIDSSPbR). All rights reserved.

Post-COVID-19 acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: Case report and review of the literature

Background: Our understanding of the spectrum of neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19 keeps evolving. Reports of life-threatening neurological complications, such as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), are alarmingly growing in number. Case presentation: We report a 42 years old previously healthy man who presented with left visual loss and cognition deterioration, manifesting at least ten days after infection with SARS-CoV-2. Serological work-up for potential immunological markers (i.e., antibodies against aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein) were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple bilateral and asymmetrical lesions in the brainstem, cortical, juxtacortical, and periventricular regions, with surrounding edema. Post-contrast sequences demonstrated punctate, ring, and open ring enhancement patterns. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy was initiated for the patient, and he was placed on rituximab. After one month, his clinical symptoms had resolved, and his cognitive function was normal. Conclusion(s): We conducted an extensive literature search, and COVID-19-associated ADEM cases reported thus far were identified and reviewed. ADEM often occurs in a post-infectious fashion;however, it is unclear how SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger such rapidly progressive episodes of encephalopathy and demyelination. Nevertheless, considering the alarming number of cases of ADEM developing after SARS-CoV-2 infection, neurologists should consider this severe phenotype of COVID-19 neurological complication in mind, enabling prompt therapeutic interventions to be made.Copyright © 2022

A Case Report and Literature Review of New-Onset Myasthenia Gravis After COVID-19 Infection.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction caused by a B-cell-mediated, T-cell-dependent immunologic attack at the end plate of the postsynaptic membrane. Attack on muscle acetylcholine receptors (AChR) of the postsynaptic membrane due to the AChR, muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, or lipoprotein receptor-related peptide 4 antibodies lead to symptoms of painless, fluctuating weakness of muscle groups and often begins with ocular signs and symptoms. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus closely related to SARS-CoV. Serious neurologic complications are infrequent and diverse with reported cases of stroke, encephalitis/meningitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, ataxia, and unspecified limb weakness. MG is a rarely reported sequela of COVID-19 infection. To date, there are 15 reported cases of post-COVID-19 MG. In this article, we present a case of post-COVID-19 MG and a concise review of other reported cases. An 83-year-old Caucasian male with a medical history of atrial fibrillation status post-ablation and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was initially admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia. He was treated with remdesivir, convalescent plasma, and supplemental oxygen therapy but did not require invasive mechanical intubation. One month after discharge, he started experiencing fatigue with muscle weakness and progressive dyspnea. He progressed to develop dysphonia, especially at the end of the day. After extensive workup, he was diagnosed with MG with a positive antibody against the AChR. The chronological events of developing slowly worsening muscular weakness after recovering from COVID-19 infection and positive AChR antibody led to the diagnosis of post-COVID-19 new-onset MG. Post-COVID-19 fatigue, long-term use of steroids, and intensive care unit-related physical deconditioning can be confounders in the clinical presentation of post-COVID-19 new-onset MG. Careful history-taking and meticulous assessment of chronological events are needed to diagnose this rare entity.

The Draft Report by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare Does Not Provide Any Evidence That Graded Exercise Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Are Safe and Effective Treatments for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWiG) recently published its draft report to the government about myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). The IQWiG concluded that graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) should be recommended in the treatment for mild and moderate ME/CFS based on two CBT and two GET studies. In this article, we reviewed the evidence used by IQWiG to support their claims, because their conclusion is diametrically opposed to the conclusion by the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in its recently updated ME/CFS guidelines. Our analysis shows that the trials IQWiG used in support suffered from serious flaws, which included badly designed control groups; relying on subjective primary outcomes in non-blinded studies; alliance and response shift bias, including patients in their trials who did not have the disease under investigation, selective reporting, making extensive endpoint changes and low to very low adherence of treatments. Our analysis also shows that the report itself used one CBT and one GET study that both examined a different treatment. The report also used a definition of CBT that does not reflect the way it is being used in ME/CFS or was tested in the studies. The report noted that one study used a wrong definition of post-exertional malaise (PEM), the main characteristic of the disease, according to the report. Yet, it ignored the consequence of this, that less than the required minimum percentage of patients had the disease under investigation in that study. It also ignored the absence of improvement on most of the subjective outcomes, as well as the fact that the IQWiG methods handbook states that one should use objective outcomes and not rely on subjective outcomes in non-blinded studies. The report concluded that both treatments did not lead to objective improvement in the six-minute walk test but then ignored that. The report did not analyze the other objective outcomes of the studies (step test and occupational and benefits status), which showed a null effect. Finally, the report states that the studies do not report on safety yet assumes that the treatments are safe based on a tendency towards small subjective improvements in fatigue and physical functioning, even though the adherence to the treatments was (very) low and the studies included many patients who did not have the disease under investigation and, consequently, did not suffer from exertion intolerance contrary to ME/CFS patients. At the same time, it ignored and downplayed all the evidence that both treatments are not safe, even when the evidence was produced by a British university. In conclusion, the studies used by the report do not provide any evidence that CBT and GET are safe and effective. Consequently, the report and the studies do not provide any support for the recommendation to use CBT and GET for ME/CFS or long COVID, which, in many cases, is the same or resembles ME/CFS, after an infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Knowledge and Perceptions of Reactive Arthritis Diagnosis and Management Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Survey.

BACKGROUND: Reactive arthritis (ReA) is an often neglected disease that received some attention during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. There is some evidence that infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can lead to "reactive" arthritis. However, this does not follow the classical definition of ReA that limits the organisms leading to this condition. Also, there is no recommendation by any international society on the management of ReA during the current pandemic. Thus, a survey was conducted to gather information about how modern clinicians across the world approach ReA. METHODS: An e-survey was carried out based on convenient sampling via social media platforms. Twenty questions were validated on the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management of ReA. These also included information on post-COVID-19 arthritis. Duplicate entries were prevented and standard guidelines were followed for reporting internet-based surveys. RESULTS: There were 193 respondents from 24 countries. Around one-fifth knew the classical definition of ReA. Nearly half considered the triad of conjunctivitis, urethritis and asymmetric oligoarthritis a "must" for diagnosis of ReA. Other common manifestations reported include enthesitis, dermatitis, dactylitis, uveitis, and oral or genital ulcers. Three-fourths opined that no test was specific for ReA. Drugs for ReA were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular injections, and conventional disease-modifying agents with less than 10% supporting biological use. CONCLUSION: The survey brought out the gap in existing concepts of ReA. The current definition needs to be updated. There is an unmet need for consensus recommendations for the management of ReA, including the use of biologicals.

Ask the Experts: An International Consensus on Managing Post-Infectious Olfactory Dysfunction Including COVID-19.

Purpose of Review: To summarise the current understanding of post-infectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD) and provide a consensus on management of the condition through an evidence-based approach, critically reviewing the available management options. Recent Findings: New studies investigating the pathophysiology of PIOD in COVID-19 patients have found that in those with persistent symptoms there is an association with lower tissue perfusion in the orbital and medial regions of the frontal lobe. Recent meta-analyses have listed olfactory training as the first line management for PIOD. Summary: Olfactory training remains the most recommended management option for PIOD. The use of systemic corticosteroids to treat PIOD is not encouraged due to poor evidence.

Is SARS-CoV-2 the only cause of long-COVID?

Around 10% of adults infected with SARS-CoV-2 that survive a first episode of COVID-19 appear to experience long-term clinical manifestations. The signs and symptoms of this post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) include fatigue, dyspnea, joint pain, myalgia, chest pain, cough, anosmia, dysgeusia, headache, depression, anxiety, memory loss, concentration difficulties, and insomnia. These sequelae remind the constellation of clinical manifestations previously recognized as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). This condition has been described following distinct infectious events, mostly acute viral illnesses. In this way, the pathophysiology of PACS might overlap with mechanisms involved in other post-infectious fatigue syndromes. The risk of PACS is more frequent in women than men. Additional host genetic factors could be involved. There is a dysregulation of multiple body organs and systems, involving the immune system, the coagulation cascade, endocrine organs, autonomic nervous system, microbiota-gut-brain axis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, etc. Hypothetically, an abnormal response to certain infectious agents could trigger the development of postinfectious fatigue syndromes.

Associations of unspecified pain, idiopathic pain and COVID-19 in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study.

Background: Few studies have investigated unspecified or idiopathic pain associated with COIVD-19. This study aimed to provide the incidence rates of unspecified pain and idiopathic pain in patients with COVID-19 for 90 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Methods: A propensity score matched cohort was used, including all patients with COVID-19 in South Korea, and analyzed their electronic medical records. The control group consisted of those who had not had tests for COVID-19 at all. Unspecified pain diagnoses consisted of diagnoses related to pain included in the ICD-10 Chapter XVIII. Idiopathic pain disorders included fibromyalgia, temporomandibular joint disorders, headaches, chronic prostatitis, complex regional pain syndrome, atypical facial pain, irritable bowel syndrome, and interstitial cystitis. Results: After matching, the number of participants in each group was 7,911. For most unspecified pain, the incidences were higher in the COVID-19 group (11.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.0-12.5) than in the control group (6.5%; 95% CI, 6.0-7.1). For idiopathic pain, only the headaches had a significantly higher incidence in the COVID-19 group (6.6%; 95% CI, 6.1-7.2) than in the control group (3.7%; 95% CI, 3.3-4.1). However, using a different control group that included only patients who visited a hospital at least once for any reasons, the incidences of most unspecified and idiopathic pain were higher in the control group than in the COVID-19 group. Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19 might be at a higher risk of experiencing unspecified pain in the acute phase or after recovery compared with individuals who had not had tests for COVID-19.

A Survey-Based Study on the Impact of Post-Covid 19 Symptoms among Indians

Background The entire world is combating COVID-19;however, a significant proportion of patients demonstrate the persistence of some COVID-19 symptoms, new symptom development, or exaggeration of pre-existing disease after a negative viral load. They are referred to as a post-COVID-19 syndrome. According to various researches, COVID-19 has a wide range of long-term effects on virtually all systems, including the respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, neurological, mental, and dermatological systems. Finding the various symptoms of post-acute and chronic is critical since they might have a significant impact on the patients' everyday functioning. As a result, we aimed to distinguish the symptoms immediately after the initial phase in which the symptoms affected them for more than three weeks.The symptoms prolonged for a few weeks in post covid time are referred to as acute COVID-19 and the symptoms that persist with the affected individuals for more than three months are referred to as chronic COVID - 19. This paper was written as a review report to provide an overview of the nature and frequency of symptoms observed by patients with mild COVID-19 after the first three weeks. We also envisionedlooking at the various incidences and factors that contribute to the development of post-COVID-19 syndrome in different patient groups, as well as the chances of overcoming it. Objective The objective of this review paper is as follows: To establish the prevalence and characteristics of the post-COVID 19 syndrome in COVID-19 survivors, as well as the factors associated with persistent symptoms. To increase community knowledge about the type and frequency of persistent symptoms experienced by patients post serious and moderate COVID-19 infection. Methods The three-session questionnaire, which includes patient demographic data, vaccination status, and patient status during COVID-19, and post-COVID-19 syndrome, was provided to the public who recovered from COVID-19 and received their responses as primary data. The responses were evaluated to show the relationship between numerous factors that induce post-COVID-19 syndrome. Results A total of 136 responses were obtained and evaluated. This literature review comprised ten publications. As a result, the frequency of persistent symptoms in individuals following mild COVID-19 infection ranged from 15% to 45%. Symptoms reported in mild COVID-19 infected people can be classified as physical, mental, or social. Weakness was the most frequently mentioned consistent symptom. Dyspnea, cough, chest pain, headache, poor mental and cognitive state, and olfactory impairment were also reported as persistent symptoms. There was a significant impact seen in their employment and the daily functioning of the patients. Copyright © 2022, Anka Publishers. All rights reserved.

Autoimmune myasthenia gravis after COVID-19 in a triple vaccinated patient.

Despite a well characterized mechanism, myasthenia gravis (MG) remains a dilemma in terms of etiology. Several case reports and series of cases suggest a potential cause-effect relation between SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination and MG. We present the case of an autoimmune MG occurring post Covid-19 in an elderly male, vaccinated with three doses of the BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The 78-year-old male was admitted in the Neurology Clinic in early November 2021 with double vision, bilateral ptosis, dysphonia and dysphagia, 16 days after receiving a third dose of the BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and 12 days after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The symptoms began to emerge at 9 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Clinical neurological examination included ice-pack test and intramuscular neostigmine, both with positive results. Myasthenia gravis positive diagnosis was confirmed by slow repetitive nerve stimulation and abnormally increased serum levels of antibodies against acetylcholine receptors. Due to patient's refusal of further hospitalization, he was discharged with therapy recommendations. Under treatment with oral pyridostigmine, but no oral corticosteroid due to therapeutic noncompliance, the patient was readmitted two months later with aggravated symptoms. The myasthenic crisis was successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroid therapy and oral pyridostigmine. The novelty of the current case resides in the fact that, to the best of our knowledge, appears to be the first case of MG clinically manifested after COVID-19 infection in a fully vaccinated patient.

Post-COVID-19 pain syndrome: a descriptive study in Turkish population.

Background: The new type of corona virus has a wide range of symptoms. Some people who have COVID-19 can experience long-term effects from their infection, known as post-COVID conditions. The authors aimed to investigate prolonged musculoskeletal pain as a symptom of the post-COVID-19 condition. Methods: This is a descriptive study on the patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 in a university hospital, between March 2020 and March 2021. Patient records and an extensive questionnaire were used to obtain relevant demographic and clinical characteristics, including hospitalization history, comorbidities, smoking history, duration of the pain, the area of pain, and the presence of accompanying neuropathic symptoms. Results: Of the diagnosed patients, 501 agreed to participate in the study. Among the participants, 318 had musculoskeletal pain during COVID-19 infection, and 69 of them reported prolonged pain symptoms as part of their a post-COVID condition which could not be attributed to any other cause. The mean duration of pain was 4.38 ± 1.73 months, and the mean pain level was 7.2 ± 4.3. Neuropathic pain symptoms such as burning sensation (n = 16, 23.2%), numbness (n = 15, 21.7%), tingling (n = 10, 14.5%), stinging (n = 4, 5.8%), freezing (n = 1, 1.4%) were accompanied in patients with prolonged musculoskeletal pain. Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19 may develop prolonged musculoskeletal pain. In some patients, neuropathic pain accompanies it. Awareness of prolonged post-COVID-19 pain is crucial for its early detection and management.

Multidimensional phenotyping of the post-COVID-19 syndrome: A Swiss survey study.

INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 syndrome affects approximately 10-25% of people after a COVID-19 infection, irrespective of initial COVID-19 severity. The aim of this project was to assess the clinical characteristics, course, and prognosis of post-COVID-19 syndrome using a systematic multidimensional approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An online survey of people with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndrome, distributed via Swiss COVID-19 support groups, social media, and our post-COVID-19 consultation, was performed. A total of 8 post-infectious domains were assessed with 120 questions. Data were collected from October 15 to December 12, 2021, and 309 participants were included. Analysis of clinical phenomenology of post-COVID-19 syndrome was performed using comparative statistics. RESULTS: The three most prevalent post-COVID-19 symptoms in our survey cohort were fatigue (288/309, 93.2%), pain including headache (218/309, 70.6%), and sleep-wake disturbances (mainly insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness, 145/309, 46.9%). Post-COVID-19 syndrome had an impact on work ability, as more than half of the respondents (168/268, 62.7%) reported an inability to work, which lasted on average 26.6 weeks (95% CI 23.5-29.6, range 1-94, n = 168). Quality of life measured by WHO-5 Well-being Index was overall low in respondents with post-COVID-19 syndrome (mean, 95% CI 9.1 [8.5-9.8], range 1-25, n = 239). CONCLUSION: Fatigue, pain, and sleep-wake disturbances were the main symptoms of the post-COVID-19 syndrome in our cohort and had an impact on the quality of life and ability to work in a majority of patients. However, survey respondents reported a significant reduction in symptoms over 12 months. Post-COVID-19 syndrome remains a significant challenge. Further studies to characterize this syndrome and to explore therapeutic options are therefore urgently needed.

Malignant Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM) Presenting as a Stroke Alert: A Case Report.

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is a rare illness. Generally characterized by encephalopathy and non-specific, heterogeneous neurological deficits depending on the location of the demyelinated lesions, ADEM is considered a clinical diagnosis with radiological findings that may or may not have supportive features based on the temporal relationship of an inciting factor and symptom onset. Even rarer, hyperacute or malignant ADEM can be defined by rapid symptom onset followed by catastrophic brain edema and its sequelae. We present a case of a patient who presented with an acute stroke with activation of a rapid sequence care pathway (stroke alert protocol) to mobilize resources that could expedite his care to determine eligibility for thrombolysis. ADEM was the definitive diagnosis with a subsequent rapid and treatment-refractory decline.

Persisting gastrointestinal symptoms and post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection: results from the Arizona CoVHORT.

In this study, we aimed to examine the association between gastrointestinal (GI) symptom presence during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the prevalence of GI symptoms and the development of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS). We used data from a prospective cohort and logistic regression to examine the association between GI symptom status during confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and prevalence of persistent GI symptoms at ≥45 days. We also report the incidence of PI-IBS following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 1475 participants in this study, 33.8% (n = 499) had GI symptoms during acute infection. Cases with acute GI symptoms had an odds of persisting GI symptoms 4 times higher than cases without acute GI symptoms (odds ratio (OR) 4.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.45-7.53); symptoms lasted on average 8 months following infection. Of those with persisting GI symptoms, 67% sought care for their symptoms and incident PI-IBS occurred in 3.0% (n = 15) of participants. Those with acute GI symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection are likely to have similar persistent symptoms 45 days and greater. These data indicate that attention to a potential increase in related healthcare needs is warranted.

Fatigue in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: Clinical Phenomenology, Comorbidities and Association With Initial Course of COVID-19.

Introduction: Post-COVID-19 syndrome affects approximately 10-25% of people suffering from COVID-19 infection, irrespective of initial COVID-19 severity. Fatigue is one of the major symptoms, occurring in 30-90% of people with post-COVID-19 syndrome. This study aims at describing factors associated with fatigue in people with Post-COVID-19 seen in our newly established Post-Covid clinic. Methods: This retrospective single center study included 42 consecutive patients suffering from Post-COVID-19 syndrome treated at the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, between 11/2020 and05/2021. Clinical phenomenology of Post-COVID-19 syndrome with a special focus on fatigue and risk factor identification was performed using Mann-Whitney U Test, Pearson Correlation, and Chi-Quadrat-Test. Results: Fatigue (90.5%) was the most prevalent Post-COVID-19 symptom followed by depressive mood (52.4%) and sleep disturbance (47.6%). Fatigue was in mean severe (Fatigue severity scale (FSS) mean 5.5 points (95% Confidence interval (95CI) 5.1 - 5.9, range .9 - 6.9, n = 40), and it was unrelated to age, COVID-19 severity or sex. The only related factors with fatigue severity were daytime sleepiness and depressed mood. Conclusion: Fatigue is the main symptom of the Post-COVID-19 syndrome in our cohort. Further studies describing this syndrome are needed to prepare the healthcare systems for the challenge of treating patients with Post-COVID-19 syndrome.